This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To determine the frequency of high-convexity tight sulci (HCTS) in a population-based sample and whether the presence of HCTS and related features influenced participants' cognitive status and classification within the new Alzheimer-biomarker framework.
Methods We analyzed 684 participants ≥50 years of age who were enrolled in the prospective population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and underwent structural MRI, amyloid PET imaging, and tau PET imaging. A fully automated machine-learning algorithm that had been developed previously in house was used to detect neuroimaging features of HCTS. On the basis of PET and MRI measures, participants were classified as having normal (A−) or abnormal (A+) amyloid, normal (T−) or abnormal (T+) tau, and normal (N−) or abnormal (N+) neurodegeneration. The neuropsychological battery assessed domain-specific and global cognitive scores. Gait speed also was assessed. Analyses were adjusted for age and sex.
Results Of 684 participants, 45 (6.6%) were classified with HCTS according to the automated algorithm. Patients with HCTS were older than patients without HCTS (mean [SD] 78.0 [8.3] vs 71.9 [10.8] years; p < 0.001). More were cognitively impaired after age and sex adjustment (27% vs 9%; p = 0.005). Amyloid PET status was similar with and without HCTS, but tau PET standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) was lower for those with HCTS after age and sex adjustment (p < 0.001). Despite a lower tau SUVR, patients with HCTS had lower Alzheimer disease (AD) signature cortical thickness. With the amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration framework, HCTS was overrepresented in the T−(N)+ group, regardless of amyloid status.
Conclusion The HCTS pattern represents a definable subgroup of non-AD pathophysiology (i.e., T−[N]+) that is associated with cognitive impairment. HCTS may confound clinical and biomarker interpretation in AD clinical trials.
Glossary
- Aβ42=
- β-amyloid42;
- AD=
- Alzheimer disease;
- AT(N)=
- amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration;
- CDD=
- CSF dynamics disorder;
- DESH=
- disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus;
- FLAIR=
- and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- HCTS=
- high-convexity tight sulci;
- MCALT=
- Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template;
- MCSA=
- Mayo Clinic Study of Aging;
- MPRAGE=
- magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo;
- NPH=
- normal-pressure hydrocephalus;
- PiB=
- Pittsburgh compound B;
- SUVR=
- standard uptake value ratio
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received February 12, 2019.
- Accepted in final form June 19, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Author response: Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics disorders: Relationship to Alzheimer biomarkers and cognition
- Reader response: Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics disorders: Relationship to Alzheimer biomarkers and cognition
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Cross-sectional associations of tau-PET signal with cognition in cognitively unimpaired adults
Age and neurodegeneration imaging biomarkers in persons with Alzheimer disease dementia
Weighting and standardization of frequencies to determine prevalence of AD imaging biomarkers
Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging