This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Black and Hispanic people with multiple sclerosis (MS) (pMS) have been found to have different disease courses or worse outcomes associated with MS compared to White pMS. They are also more likely to be negatively affected by social determinants of health, further worsening disparities in outcomes. As these disparities may affect treatment response, non-White pMS must be included in trials for greater generalizability of research and therefore more inclusive treatment plans. In this study, we aimed to evaluate how representation of non-White groups in phase III trials of approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has evolved over time and how race and ethnicity are reported in medical journals and on manufacturer websites.
Methods We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed database from 1995 to June 2020 to identify manufacturer-sponsored phase III trials for Food and Drug Administration–approved MS DMTs. We explored how race and ethnicity were reported in trial publications. Using studies where information was available, we analyzed the representation of non-White pMS over time and compared to multinational census data. We reviewed patient- and health care provider (HCP)–facing websites of available DMTs to assess the dissemination of information on racial and ethnic representation in trials.
Results A total of 44 phase III trial publications were reviewed, representing 45 trials, among which 17 (37.8%) did not report race or ethnicity, 14 (31.1%) reported race and ethnicity as proportion of White participants only, and 14 (31.1%) reported 2 or more races/ethnicities. When compared to multinational census data, non-White pMS were significantly underrepresented in MS trials. Due to lack of data, trends in representation of other races and ethnicities could not be assessed. No patient- or HCP-facing DMT websites reported data on race and ethnicity in pivotal trials. Study results are available on our study dashboard.
Conclusion Race and ethnicity are underreported in MS DMT trial publications and race and ethnic representation are omitted from manufacturer websites. When available, data show that non-White pMS are significantly underrepresented in MS trials. The availability of this information is crucial for patients, together with their HCPs, to make informed decisions about their care.
Glossary
- DMT=
- disease-modifying therapy;
- FDA=
- Food and Drug Administration;
- HCP=
- health care provider;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- pMS=
- people with multiple sclerosis;
- SSDoH=
- structural and social determinants of health
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 345
- Received June 11, 2021.
- Accepted in final form December 1, 2021.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
