This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To determine diagnostic accuracy for AD in a population-based study of Japanese–American men. AD is neuropathologically confirmed for more than 80% of cases at major referral centers (primarily Caucasians); however, information on diagnostic accuracy in population-based studies and studies of different ethnic groups is limited.
Methods: There were 3,734 men who participated in the Honolulu–Asia Aging Study 1991 through 1993 dementia examination and 2,603 in the 1994 through 1996 examination. Diagnoses were based on published criteria. Neuropathologists blinded to clinical data quantified neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and neuritic plaques (NP).
Results: Of 220 autopsied subjects, clinical evaluation revealed 68 with normal cognition, 73 intermediate, and 79 with dementia: 20 AD, 27 vascular dementia, 19 AD + other, and 13 other dementia. Among 20 cases with pure AD, the median value for maximum neocortical NFT density was 6.9/mm2 and for neocortical NP density was 8.0/mm2. Corresponding densities for other groups were <3.0/mm2. Using established neuropathologic criteria, 25% (5/20) of clinical AD cases had enough NP to meet definite AD criteria, whereas 65% (13/20) had sufficient NP to meet neuropathologic definite or probable AD criteria. Among nine AD cases with moderately severe dementia, only two (22%) had NP densities great enough to meet definite neuropathologic criteria, whereas seven (78%) met neuropathologic criteria for probable AD.
Conclusions: Neuropathologic confirmation and NP density among decedents with clinical AD in this population-based study were lower than reported by referral centers and similar to reports from two other community studies. Ethnic differences in propensity for amyloid deposition as well as differences in clinical severity and representativeness of cases might contribute to these findings.
- Received August 4, 2000.
- Accepted March 12, 2001.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Association of Neurofilament Light With the Development and Severity of Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rodolfo Savica and Dr. Parichita Choudhury