This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Individuals with a history of recurrent dream-enactment behaviors, but with subthreshold REM sleep without atonia levels for REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) diagnosis, are currently classified to have prodromal RBD (pRBD). However, the REM sleep–elevated EMG diagnostic cutoff, progression trajectory, and long-term neurodegenerative outcome of pRBD are not well understood. This study aimed to delineate the evolution of REM sleep EMG levels, determine the EMG cutoff score for diagnosing pRBD, and examine the risk for neurodegenerative diseases of pRBD.
Methods This retrospective longitudinal case-control study recruited patients with pRBD and age-matched, sex-matched, and follow-up duration–matched controls who were free of neurodegenerative disease at baseline in the Sleep Assessment Unit, the Chinese University of Hong Kong from 1997 to 2018. Patients and controls underwent clinical and video-polysomnography (PSG) assessments at baseline and follow-up(s). REM sleep EMG activity level on mentalis and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles on video-PSG at each visit was scored. The diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases was confirmed by a neurologist.
Results A total of 44 patients (age 67.4 ± 8.2 years, 6 females) and 44 controls were recruited. The combined REM sleep EMG level on mentalis and AT muscles of patients with pRBD significantly increased during 8.2 ± 3.3 years of follow-up (from 19.3% ± 9.7% to 47.3% ± 27.4% with estimated annual increase of 3.9%), yielding 29 patients with pRBD (66%) meeting the full-blown RBD diagnostic criteria. Baseline REM sleep mentalis and AT muscles EMG activity of patients who developed full-blown RBD could favorably differentiate pRBD from controls (6.3% for mentalis “any” and 9.1% for combination of mentalis any and bilateral AT muscles phasic EMG with an area under the curve of 0.88 [0.78–0.98] and 0.97 [0.92–1.00], respectively). Patients with pRBD had a higher risk for neurodegenerative diseases (9 developed Parkinson disease and 3 developed dementia with Lewy bodies) when compared with controls (5 developed Alzheimer disease, adjusted hazard ratio = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.02–8.54).
Discussion pRBD has a predictive progression in both pathophysiology and neurodegenerative outcome. This finding has significant implications to the nosological status of pRBD, the current REM sleep-related EMG diagnostic criteria, spectrum concept of RBD, and future neuroprotective intervention.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that EMG activity during REM sleep predicts the development of pRBD.
Glossary
- AT=
- anterior tibialis;
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- iRBD=
- idiopathic or isolated REM sleep behavior disorder;
- pRBD=
- prodromal REM sleep behavior disorder;
- PSG=
- polysomnography;
- RBD=
- REM sleep behavior disorder;
- RSWA=
- REM sleep without atonia
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Peter Hedera, MD, PhD.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received August 5, 2021.
- Accepted in final form March 24, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
