ALS treatment strikes out while trying for a homer
The topiramate trial
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Since the time amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) claimed Lou Gehrig’s life, there has been remarkable progress in preclinical research suggesting that the pathogenesis of ALS involves free radical toxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, glutamate excitotoxicity, intermediate filament aggregation, and apoptotic pathways. However, this basic science progress has yet to be translated into practical clinical applications. A decade since it was introduced,1 riluzole remains the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved medication for ALS. Although survival was the outcome measure in the riluzole trials, its use is problematic because it requires a large sample size and relatively long study duration. In search of a surrogate, ALS researchers have turned to alternative outcome measures such as the slope of muscle strength decline, which was used in the trial of topiramate reported by Cudkowicz et al. in this issue of Neurology.2
The 296 study participants received up to 800 mg daily of topiramate or placebo for 12 months. Whereas …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Deborah Friedman and Dr. Stacy Smith
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trialsLeonard H. van den Berg, Eric Sorenson, Gary Gronseth et al.Neurology, March 08, 2019 -
Views & Reviews
ALS drug development guidances and trial guidelinesConsensus and opportunities for alignmentJinsy A. Andrews, Lucie I. Bruijn, Jeremy M. Shefner et al.Neurology, June 06, 2019 -
Global Perspectives
Feedback interaction of research, advocacy, and clinical care applied to ALS research in South AmericaMiriam E. Bucheli, Amelia Calderón, Diana Chicaiza et al.Neurology, November 25, 2013 -
Article
The PRO-ACT databaseDesign, initial analyses, and predictive featuresNazem Atassi, James Berry, Amy Shui et al.Neurology, October 08, 2014