Spinal motoneuron excitability after acute spinal cord injury in humans
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Few studies in humans have assessed the ability of Ia afferent and antidromic motor volleys to activate motoneurons during spinal shock. Hence, little is known about the excitability state of the spinal motoneuron pool after acute spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans. Methods: In 14 patients with acute SCI involving anatomic levels T10 and above, we performed clinical and electrophysiologic studies early after injury (within 24 hours in seven subjects) and on day 10, 20, and 30 postinjury. Maximal H:M ratios, F-wave persistence, and tendon tap T-reflexes were recorded. Sixteen normal subjects and eight chronic SCI patients served as control subjects. Results: Ten of 14 patients had spinal shock (complete paralysis, loss of sensation, absent reflexes, and muscle hypotonia below the injury) at the time of initial evaluation. F-waves were absent in patients with spinal shock, reduced in persistence in patients with acute SCI without spinal shock, and normal in persistence in patients with chronic SCI. H-reflexes were absent or markedly suppressed in patients with spinal shock within 24 hours of injury but recovered to normal amplitudes within several days postinjury. This recovery occurred despite absence of F-waves that persisted for several weeks postinjury. Deep tendon reflexes were proportionally more depressed in spinal shock than were H-reflexes. All patients had elicitable H-reflexes for days or weeks before the development of clinical reflexes. Conclusions: Rostral cord injury causes postsynaptic changes (hyperpolarization) in caudal motoneurons. This hyperpolarization is a major physiologic derangement in spinal shock. The rise in H-reflex amplitude despite evidence of persistent hyperpolarization is due to enhanced transmission at Ia fiber-motoneuron connections below the SCI. Finally, the observation that the stretch reflex is proportionally more depressed than the H-reflex is consistent with fusimotor drive also being depressed after SCI.
NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 231-237
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
From spinal shock to spasticityNeuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injuryLutz-Peter Hiersemenzel, Armin Curt, Volker Dietz et al.Neurology, April 25, 2000 -
Article
Long-term functional outcome in patients with acquired infections after acute spinal cord injuryMarcel A. Kopp, Ralf Watzlawick, Peter Martus et al.Neurology, January 27, 2017 -
Article
Spinal cord perfusion pressure predicts neurologic recovery in acute spinal cord injuryJordan W. Squair, Lise M. Bélanger, Angela Tsang et al.Neurology, September 15, 2017 -
Article
Trajectory-Based Classification of Recovery in Sensorimotor Complete Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryBlessing N.R. Jaja, Jetan Badhiwala, James Guest et al.Neurology, April 13, 2021