Abstract
Objective: Hemispheric surgery effectively treats unihemispheric pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) by resecting or disconnecting the epileptic hemisphere. Modifications to the original anatomic hemispherectomy have generated multiple functionally equivalent, disconnective techniques for performing hemispheric surgery, termed functional hemispherotomy. While myriad hemispherotomy variants exist, all of them can be categorized according to the anatomic plane they are performed in, which includes vertical approaches at or near the interhemispheric fissure and lateral approaches at or near the Sylvian fissure. This meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) aimed to compare seizure outcomes and complications between the hemispherotomy approaches to better characterize their relative efficacy and safety in the modern neurosurgical treatment of pediatric DRE given emerging evidence that outcomes may differ between them.
Methods: CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 9th, 2020 for studies reporting IPD from pediatric patients with DRE who underwent hemispheric surgery. Outcomes of interest were seizure freedom at last follow-up, time-to-seizure recurrence, and complications including hydrocephalus, infection, and mortality. Chi-squared test compared the frequency of seizure freedom and complications. Multivariable mixed-effects Cox regression controlling for predictors of seizure outcome was performed on propensity-score matched patients to compare time-to-seizure recurrence between approaches. Kaplan-Meier curves were made to visualize differences in time-to-seizure recurrence.
Results: Fifty-five studies reporting on 686 unique pediatric patients treated with hemispheric surgery were included for meta-analysis. Among the hemispherotomy subgroup, vertical approaches had greater seizure freedom rates (81.2% vs. 70.7%, p=0.014) than lateral approaches. While there were no differences in complications, lateral hemispherotomy had higher rates of revision hemispheric surgery due to incomplete disconnection and/or recurrent seizures than vertical hemispherotomy (16.3% vs. 1.2%, p<0.001). After propensity-score matching, vertical hemispherotomy approaches independently conferred longer time-to-seizure recurrence than lateral hemispherotomy approaches (HR=0.44, 95%-CI=0.19-0.98).
Conclusions: Among functional hemispherotomy techniques, vertical hemispherotomy approaches confer more durable seizure freedom than lateral approaches without compromising safety. Future prospective studies are required to definitively determine whether vertical approaches are indeed superior and how it should influence clinical guidelines for performing hemispheric surgery.
- Received May 30, 2022.
- Accepted in final form April 3, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
