Immunotherapy and multiple sclerosis
The devil is in the details
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
![Loading Loading](https://n.neurology.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/panels_ajax_tab/images/loading.gif)
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
The depiction of Judgment Day on the façade of the Cathedral of Notre Dame shows an angel weighing the good and evil of souls to determine whence they go. Hanging on one side are devils tilting the scale in the wrong direction. In making decisions about treating multiple sclerosis (MS) with immunotherapies, we weigh risks and benefits. For us, the devil is in the details of those risks and benefits. If we underestimate risks or overestimate benefits, the scales can tilt in the wrong direction.
In 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registered the chemotherapy drug, mitoxantrone, for the treatment of aggressive relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The FDA based its decision largely on the results of a placebo-controlled trial conducted by the Mitoxantrone for Multiple Sclerosis (MIMS) Study Group. FDA approval came when the only published data from the trial were in abstracts.1,2 When the complete report of the MIMS trial was finally published in 2002,3 neurologists were already using mitoxantrone to treat SPMS.
In 2003, the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment (TTA) Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reviewed the evidence on mitoxantrone for the treatment of MS.4 The TTA subcommittee noted that there were blinding problems with the MIMS trial, the study …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Association of Neurofilament Light With the Development and Severity of Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rodolfo Savica and Dr. Parichita Choudhury
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Eye on Practice
Practice patterns of US neurologists in patients with SPMS and PPMSA consensus studyOmar Khan, Aaron E. Miller, Carlo Tornatore et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, March 16, 2012 -
Articles
Effect of mitoxantrone on MRI in progressive MSResults of the MIMS trialH. Krapf, S. P. Morrissey, O. Zenker et al.Neurology, September 12, 2005 -
Special Article
Assessment: The use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review)Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of NeurologyD. S. Goodin, B. A. Cohen, P. O’Connor et al.Neurology, September 02, 2008 -
Review
Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisNew InsightsBruce A.C. Cree, Douglas L. Arnold, Jeremy Chataway et al.Neurology, June 04, 2021