This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
To the Editor:
Jaeckle et al.1 compared the survival rates in glioblastoma patients who used enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC) to those of patients who did not. The authors performed a careful—albeit retrospective—pooled subgroup analysis of 3 chemotherapy trials. As they state, their results are counterintuitive. However, there are many limitations.
It is unclear which drugs were prescribed. The study period and location suggest that phenytoin (PHT) was the most popular compound. However, PHT and dexamethasone exert a reciprocal pharmacokinetic interaction, mutually lowering the efficacy of the other drug due to concurrent protein binding competition and hepatic enzyme induction.2 It is counterintuitive to conclude that patients would live longer because the administered drugs act less.
Of 605 patients, 71.4% received EIAC, 2.3% were on nonenzyme-inducing compounds, and 26.2% did not take any antiepileptic drug (AED). Although longitudinal data are lacking, only 14.5% experienced seizures. This corresponds to a lower epilepsy prevalence than reported in similar populations,3 and reflects the policy of prophylactic treatment. It was found that this treatment was not effective in a meta-analysis of studies where EIAC were almost exclusively administered.4 This meta-analysis also noted the frequent AED subtherapeutic levels and consistent risks of unwanted side effects. In the absence of drug serum levels, it is difficult to assume that EIAC contributed to improved survival.
The null hypothesis of shorter survival following increased chemotherapy metabolism …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa