Ankle motor skill is intact in spinal cord injury, unlike stroke
Implications for rehabilitation
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: After an incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) or stroke, the impairment of both muscle strength and accurate muscle coordination (timing and amplitude) is an expected clinical finding, although these aspects are not well-distinguished by clinical tests. The objective was to determine whether iSCI patients with impaired corticospinal tract function (reduced strength and prolonged transcranial magnetic stimulation latencies) experience a similar deterioration in muscle coordination as stroke patients.
Methods: We assessed ankle dorsal and plantar flexion strength, as well as the ability to accurately control the activation of these muscle groups, using a visuomotor torque tracking task. The task was adjusted to the level of muscle weakness, which enabled a distinction between impairment in strength and coordination to be made.
Results: Reference strength and visuomotor task performance values were obtained in 47 healthy subjects. In 27 iSCI patients with significant muscle weakness (ankle dorsal flexion 65% of healthy values, plantar flexion 76%), task performance improved at a similar rate and the final performance level equaled that of healthy subjects. However, in 10 stroke subjects the tracking task performance was significantly impaired in both legs, while strength was mainly reduced in the affected leg.
Conclusions: These findings indicate that strength is predominantly affected in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) patients, while accurate muscle activation remains largely unaffected. In stroke patients, muscle coordination deteriorates in both legs, independent of muscle weakness. Therefore, iSCI patients might benefit more from rehabilitation interventions that improve muscle strength than stroke patients, where supraspinal areas involved in motor control are additionally affected.
Glossary
- CST=
- corticospinal tract;
- DF=
- dorsal flexion;
- ICC=
- intraclass correlation coefficient;
- iSCI=
- incomplete spinal cord injury;
- MVC=
- maximum voluntary contraction;
- PF=
- plantar flexion;
- RMS=
- root mean square;
- TMS=
- transcranial magnetic stimulation.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Editorials
Losing controlBrain vs spinal cordTomoko Kitago, John W. Krakauer et al.Neurology, April 19, 2010 -
Article
Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Cluster HeadacheP. Montagna, R. Lodi, P. Cortelli et al.Neurology, January 01, 1997 -
Articles
Residual neuropathy in long-term population-based follow-up of Guillain–Barré syndromeCharlotte Dornonville de la Cour, Johannes Jakobsen et al.Neurology, January 24, 2005 -
Article
Distracting attention in phobic postural vertigo normalizes leg muscle activity and balanceMax Wuehr, Thomas Brandt, Roman Schniepp et al.Neurology, December 14, 2016