This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Determination of auditory function is a fundamental part of a complete neurologic examination. Disability from permanent hearing loss is common in the general population. Current bedside auditory tests are unreliable and cumbersome. We evaluated the calibrated finger rub auditory screening test (CALFRAST) as a routine diagnostic tool.
Methods: The sound spectrum and mean peak intensities of standard finger rub were measured, as well as background noise. CALFRAST overlapped the frequency spectrum of normal speech. Patients and companions were recruited from a neurology clinic. With arms extended, two stimulus intensities were presented: strong finger rub (CALFRAST–Strong 70) and the faintest rub that the examiner could hear (CALFRAST–Faint 70). With subjects’ eyes closed, each ear’s CALFRAST threshold was ascertained and then compared with its audiometric measure. The normal threshold was considered to be 25 dB. Validity, reliability, and discrimination abilities were obtained using standard methods.
Results: Two hundred twenty-one subjects (442 ears; 58% women) were examined. Ages ranged from 18 to 88 years, with a mean of 46 years. Eighty-five subjects (39%) had some degree of hearing loss. Both specificity and positive predictive value of CALFRAST–Strong 70 were 100%. Both sensitivity and negative predictive value of CALFRAST–Faint 70 were 99%, with a negative likelihood ratio <0.1. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94, consistent with excellent discrimination ability. Both intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent, both κ >0.8. Subjects’ self-assessment of hearing was unreliable.
Conclusion: The calibrated finger rub auditory screening test (CALFRAST) is simple, accurate, inexpensive, and reliable. As a routine screening tool, CALFRAST may contribute to more efficient identification of auditory impairment.
Glossary
- AHL=
- aging-related hearing loss;
- AT=
- auditory threshold;
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- CALFRAST=
- calibrated finger rub auditory screening test;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- FN=
- false negative;
- FP=
- false positive;
- LR=
- likelihood ratio;
- NIHL=
- noise-induced hearing loss;
- NLR=
- negative likelihood ratio;
- NPV=
- negative predictive value;
- PLR=
- positive likelihood ratio;
- PPV=
- positive predictive value;
- ROC=
- receiver operating characteristic;
- Sens=
- sensitivity;
- Spec=
- specificity;
- TN=
- true negative;
- TP=
- true positive.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Calibrated finger rub auditory screening test (CALFRAST)
- Reply from the authors
- Reply from the biostatistician
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Efficacy of Ubrogepant in the Acute Treatment of Migraine With Mild Pain vs Moderate or Severe Pain
Dr. Kathleen Digre and Dr. Kendra Pham