This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate differences between peripheral idiopathic and central sixth nerve palsies from brainstem damage by comparing peak velocities and durations of horizontal saccades.
Methods: Fourteen patients with unilateral incomplete sixth nerve palsies caused by idiopathic, presumed ischemic, peripheral damage, 5 with incomplete central (fascicular) palsy caused by brainstem lesions, and 10 controls were studied. Palsies under 1 month in duration were designated as acute and those of longer duration were chronic. Among peripheral palsies, five were acute, nine were chronic. Among central palsies, two were acute, three were chronic. Subjects made ± 10 deg horizontal saccades while wearing search coils. Serial recordings were made in seven patients with acute palsy (five peripheral, two central).
Results: Centrifugal abducting saccadic velocities in the paretic eye were subnormal in both central and peripheral acute palsies, as anticipated from lateral rectus weakness. In chronic central palsies, abducting velocities in the paretic eye remained reduced. However, in chronic peripheral palsies, velocities became normal in the tested range of excursion, within 2 months of onset, despite persisting abduction deficit.
Conclusions: Saccade peak velocities are reduced and their durations are prolonged in the field of action of acutely palsied peripheral and central nerves. Speeds remain reduced in chronic central (fascicular) palsies, consistent with limited regeneration within the brain. Saccade speeds are repaired in chronic peripheral palsies, probably by remyelination and axonal regeneration, and perhaps also by central monocular adaptation of innervation selectively to the paretic eye, in order to drive both eyes rapidly and simultaneously into the paretic field of motion.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
