Sex Differences in Intensity of Care and Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke Across the Age Continuum
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Sex differences in stroke care and outcomes have been previously reported, but it is not known whether these associations vary across the age continuum. We evaluated whether the magnitude of female-male differences in care and outcomes varied with age.
Methods In a population-based cohort study, we identified patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke between 2012 and 2019 and followed through 2020 in Ontario, Canada, using administrative data. We evaluated sex differences in receiving intensive care unit services, mechanical ventilation, gastrostomy tube insertion, comprehensive stroke center care, stroke unit care, thrombolysis, and endovascular thrombectomy using logistic regression and reported odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We used Cox proportional hazard models and reported the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI of death within 90 or 365 days. Models were adjusted for covariates and included an interaction between age and sex. We used restricted cubic splines to model the relationship between age and care and outcomes. Where the p-value for interaction was statistically significant (p < 0.05), we reported age-specific OR or HR.
Results Among 67,442 patients with ischemic stroke, 45.9% were female and the median age was 74 years (64–83). Care was similar between both sexes, except female patients had higher odds of receiving endovascular thrombectomy (OR 1.35, 95% CI [1.19–1.54] comparing female with male), and these associations were not modified by age. There was no overall sex difference in hazard of death (HR 95% CI 0.99 [0.95–1.04] for death within 90 days; 0.99 [0.96–1.03] for death within 365 days), but these associations were modified by age with the hazard of death being higher in female than male patients between the ages of 50–70 years (most extreme difference around age 57, HR 95% CI 1.25 [1.10–1.40] at 90 days, p-interaction 0.002; 1.15 [1.10–1.20] at 365 days, p-interaction 0.002).
Discussion The hazard of death after stroke was higher in female than male patients aged 50–70 years. Examining overall sex differences in outcomes without accounting for the effect modification by age may miss important findings in specific age groups.
Glossary
- HR=
- hazard ratio;
- OR=
- odds ratio
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
- Received April 28, 2022.
- Accepted in final form August 23, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Ann Yeh and Dr. Daniela Castillo Villagrán
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.