This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
We thank the authors for their contribution to an improved understanding of efficacy and complications of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with active malignancy.1 The findings of the study that patients with active cancer experienced worse outcomes after EVT, even with favorable prestroke function and technical success, is in agreement with data from the ESCAPE and ESCAPE-NA1 trials of EVT. In both these trials, we found that experiencing comorbid cancer was strongly associated with poor functional outcomes according to the modified Rankin scale score in patients at 90 days, despite achieving small final infarct volumes after EVT.2,3 While these data can help us adjust our expectations regarding post-EVT outcomes in patients with cancer, it remains challenging to identify a subset of these patients for whom EVT would be definitively futile, or even harmful, to justify withholding acute therapy—assuming they are otherwise eligible. In our clinical experience, we have found that treatment decisions become especially complex when the acute stroke evaluation unexpectedly uncovers a potential malignancy, such as an intracranial metastasis. Shared decision-making strategies have proven helpful in such settings, making the uncertain variables clear to the patient or their proxies.4
Footnotes
Author disclosures are available upon request (journal{at}neurology.org).
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
