Value of witness observations in the differential diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective This retrospective study explores to what extent additional information from event witnesses provided using the novel 31-item Paroxysmal Event Observer (PEO) Questionnaire improves the differentiation among epilepsy, syncope, and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) achievable with information provided by patients alone.
Methods Patients with transient loss of consciousness caused by proven epilepsy (n = 86), syncope (n = 79), or PNES (n = 84) attending specialist neurology/syncope services in the United Kingdom and event observers provided Paroxysmal Event Profile (PEP), PEO, and personal information (PI) (e.g., sex, age, medical history) data. PEO data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). PEO, PEP, and PI data were used separately and in combination to differentiate diagnoses by pairwise and multinomial logistic regressions. Predicted diagnoses were compared with gold standard medical diagnoses.
Results EFA/CFA identified a 4-factor structure of the PEO based on 26/31 questionnaire items with loadings ≥0.4. Observer-reported factors alone differentiated better between syncope and epilepsy than patient-reported factors (accuracy: 96% vs 85%, p = 0.0004). Observer-reported data improved accuracy over differentiation based on patient-reported data alone from 90% to 100% between syncope and epilepsy (p = 0.005), 76% to 83% between epilepsy and PNES (p = 0.006), and 93% to 95% between syncope and PNES (p = 0.098).
Conclusions Information from observers can make an important contribution to the differentiation of epilepsy from syncope or PNES but adds less to that of syncope from PNES.
Glossary
- ANOVA=
- analysis of variance;
- CFI=
- comparative fit index;
- EFA=
- exploratory factor analysis;
- PEO=
- Paroxysmal Event Observer;
- PEP=
- Paroxysmal Event Profile;
- PI=
- patient information;
- PNES=
- psychogenic nonepileptic seizures;
- RMSEA=
- root mean square error approximation;
- TLI=
- Tucker Lewis index;
- TLOC=
- transient loss of consciousness
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received June 21, 2018.
- Accepted in final form October 22, 2018.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Author response to Dr. Sethi
- Markus Reuber, MD, PhD, University of Sheffield (Sheffield, England, UK)
- Min Chen, PhD, Columbia University (New York, NY)
Submitted April 02, 2019 - Reader response: Value of witness observations in the differential diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness
- Nitin K. Sethi, Associate Professor of Neurology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center (New York, NY)
Submitted February 21, 2019
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Value of patient-reported symptoms in the diagnosis of transient loss of consciousnessMarkus Reuber, Min Chen, Jenny Jamnadas-Khoda et al.Neurology, July 06, 2016 -
Research
Machine learning as a diagnostic decision aid for patients with transient loss of consciousnessAlistair Wardrope, Jenny Jamnadas-Khoda, Mark Broadhurst et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, September 06, 2019 -
Article
The semiology of tilt-induced psychogenic pseudosyncopeMartijn R. Tannemaat, Julius van Niekerk, Robert H. Reijntjes et al.Neurology, July 19, 2013 -
Articles
Transient loss of consciousness through the eyes of a witnessR. D. Thijs, W. A. Wagenaar, H.A.M. Middelkoop et al.Neurology, November 17, 2008