Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis
A clinical and MRI challenge
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the improved diagnostic criteria, the wide use of MRI, and the growing availability of effective pharmacologic treatments have led to substantial advances in the management of multiple sclerosis (MS). The importance of early diagnosis and treatment is now well-established, but there is still no consensus on how to define and monitor response to MS treatments. In particular, the clinical relevance of the detection of minimal MRI activity is controversial and recommendations on how to define and monitor treatment response are warranted. An expert panel of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS Study Group analyzed and discussed published studies on treatment response in MS. The evolving concept of no evidence of disease activity and its effect on predicting long-term prognosis was examined, including the option of defining a more realistic target for daily clinical practice: minimal evidence of disease activity. Advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MRI activity alone and quantitative scoring systems combining on-treatment clinical relapses and MRI active lesions to detect treatment response in the real-world setting were also discussed. While most published studies on this topic involved patients treated with interferon-β, special attention was given to more recent studies providing evidence based on treatment with other and more efficacious oral and injectable drugs. Finally, the panel identified future directions to pursue in this research field.
Glossary
- BBB=
- blood–brain barrier;
- CMSWG=
- Canadian MS Working Group;
- EDSS=
- Expanded Disability Status Scale;
- FREEDOMS=
- Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod (FTY720) in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis;
- GA=
- glatiramer acetate;
- HR=
- hazard ratio;
- IFN-β=
- interferon-β;
- MEDA=
- minimal evidence of disease activity;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- NEDA=
- no evidence of disease activity;
- PRISMS=
- Prevention of Relapses and disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis;
- RRMS=
- relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis;
- SPMS=
- secondary progressive multiple sclerosis;
- TOR=
- Treatment Optimization Recommendations
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
All members of the MAGNIMS study group qualify as authors for this article.
- Received January 28, 2018.
- Accepted in final form August 31, 2018.
- Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
- Article
- Abstract
- Glossary
- Methodologic issues
- Data availability
- Definition of treatment response
- No evidence vs minimal evidence of disease activity
- Indicators of treatment response
- Monitoring treatment response clinically
- Monitoring treatment response with MRI
- Scoring treatment response
- Assessing treatment response to drugs other than IFN-β
- Recommendations and future directions
- Study funding
- Disclosure
- Acknowledgment
- Appendix Authors
- Footnotes
- References
- Figures & Data
- Info & Disclosures
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Assessing response to interferon-β in a multicenter dataset of patients with MSMaria Pia Sormani, Claudio Gasperini, Marzia Romeo et al.Neurology, June 15, 2016 -
Article
Onset of clinical and MRI efficacy of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosisFrederik Barkhof, Ludwig Kappos, Jerry S. Wolinsky et al.Neurology, September 04, 2019 -
Article
No evidence of disease activity is associated with reduced rate of axonal retinal atrophy in MSMarco Pisa, Simone Guerrieri, Giovanni Di Maggio et al.Neurology, November 15, 2017 -
Article
Predicting long-term disability outcomes in patients with MS treated with teriflunomide in TEMSOMaria Pia Sormani, Philippe Truffinet, Karthinathan Thangavelu et al.Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, June 28, 2017