This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
The turn of the 21st century heralded a new era in medical education. The Institute of Medicine reports To Err is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm called for reform of the health care system to improve the quality and safety of patient care.1,2 Concurrently, interest in competency-based medical education increased, and the alignment of an outcomes-based approach to education with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's “Triple Aim” of health care set the stage for the ongoing transformation in medical education.3,4 A major component of this transformation, specific to graduate medical education (GME), has been the Next Accreditation System (NAS) of The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally as co–first authors.
Neurology Milestones 2.0 Work Group coinvestigators are listed in the appendix at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 349
- Received May 28, 2021.
- Accepted in final form December 27, 2021.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Reader Response: Introducing the Neurology Milestones 2.0
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
- Article
- Glossary
- The First Neurology Milestones: Development & Reactions
- Neurology Milestones 2.0: The Next Iteration
- Recommended Use of Neurology Milestones 2.0
- Introducing the Supplemental Guide
- The Future of the Milestones
- Discussion
- Study Funding
- Disclosure
- Acknowledgment
- Appendix 1 Authors
- Appendix 2 Coinvestigators
- Footnotes
- References
- Figures & Data
- Info & Disclosures
