This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
In “Prestroke Disability and Outcome After Thrombectomy for Emergent Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke,” de Havenon et al. reported that of 407 patients with anterior circulation strokes, premorbid disability (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2) was associated with a higher likelihood that the 90-day mRS score would not be increased from the premorbid mRS score compared with patients without premorbid disability. However, those with premorbid disability had a higher risk of death. Feng et al. suggest that it would be helpful to evaluate the relationship between the etiology of prestroke disability and postthrombectomy outcome, but de Havenon notes that data are not included in the TRACK registry. Siegler et al. question the use of accumulated disability as the outcome measure in this study given that patients with prestroke disability are more likely to have zero functional decline than patients with no prestroke disability. They note that the results of this study could be interpreted to mean patients who do not have prestroke disability benefit less from thrombectomy, but that this conclusion would be inaccurate given that the absence of prestroke disability is associated with a lower risk of death. They suggest that the lack of new disability or an mRS score 0–2 might have been a better outcome. de Havenon responds that these end points would not be optimal either. They further comment that it would be ideal for a future study to compare outcomes among patients with premorbid disability via matched analysis of medical management vs thrombectomy. Additional research may facilitate a better understanding of factors associated with postthrombectomy outcome and impact selection criteria. Furthermore, this exchange demonstrates the fact that there are limitations of the scales that we use to assess disability following stroke.
In “Prestroke Disability and Outcome After Thrombectomy for Emergent Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke,” de Havenon et al. reported that of 407 patients with anterior circulation strokes, premorbid disability (defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2) was associated with a higher likelihood that the 90-day mRS score would not be increased from the premorbid mRS score compared with patients without premorbid disability. However, those with premorbid disability had a higher risk of death. Feng et al. suggest that it would be helpful to evaluate the relationship between the etiology of prestroke disability and postthrombectomy outcome, but de Havenon notes that data are not included in the TRACK registry. Siegler et al. question the use of accumulated disability as the outcome measure in this study given that patients with prestroke disability are more likely to have zero functional decline than patients with no prestroke disability. They note that the results of this study could be interpreted to mean patients who do not have prestroke disability benefit less from thrombectomy, but that this conclusion would be inaccurate given that the absence of prestroke disability is associated with a lower risk of death. They suggest that the lack of new disability or an mRS score 0–2 might have been a better outcome. de Havenon responds that these end points would not be optimal either. They further comment that it would be ideal for a future study to compare outcomes among patients with premorbid disability via matched analysis of medical management vs thrombectomy. Additional research may facilitate a better understanding of factors associated with postthrombectomy outcome and impact selection criteria. Furthermore, this exchange demonstrates the fact that there are limitations of the scales that we use to assess disability following stroke.
Footnotes
Author disclosures are available upon request (journal{at}neurology.org).
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
