Implementation of a data accuracy plan to improve data extraction yield in the Axon Registry®
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To conduct a data quality improvement project to improve the quality measure data mapping and to measure key phrase logic in the Axon Registry.®
Methods Prior validation analysis of the Axon Registry identified 2 main areas for remediation: methodology for mapping data from electronic health record (EHR) into the registry clinical data record (CDR) and key phrase logic for each measure. Practice groups participating in Axon Registry and 6 Axon Registry quality measures were selected for intervention. Mapping of measure elements and measure performances for each of the selected measures and practices were reviewed before intervention. The Data Accuracy Plan (DAP) was performed, and documentation data and visit data counts and data yield after intervention were calculated and analyzed.
Results Documentation data and visit data counts and data yield increased for all 6 quality measures and all practices in the DAP. Increase in documentation data count ranged from 815 to 15,782 occurrences, while visit data count increase ranged from 519 to 16,383 visits. Average data yield range was 7.22% to 33.46% before intervention and increased to a range from 15.34% to 74.40% after intervention.
Conclusion There was substantial improvement in the accuracy of data extraction for quality measure elements after intervention to improve methodology for mapping EHR data into CDR and key phrase logic. Implementation of changes and continued review of data mapping and data dictionary are important to ensure accurate measure performance and to improve reliability and validity of Axon Registry data.
Glossary
- AAN=
- American Academy of Neurology;
- BP=
- blood pressure;
- CDR=
- clinical data record;
- DAP=
- Data Accuracy Plan;
- EHR=
- electronic health record;
- ICD-9=
- International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision;
- ICD-10=
- International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision;
- MIPS=
- Merit-Based Incentive Payment System;
- PD=
- Parkinson disease;
- QI=
- quality improvement
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received June 30, 2019.
- Accepted in final form January 5, 2020.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Costs and Utilization of New-to-Market Neurologic Medications
Dr. Robert J. Fox and Dr. Mandy Leonard
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Special Article
Axon Registry® data validationAccuracy assessment of data extraction and measure specificationChristine M. Baca, Sarah Benish, Aleksandar Videnovic et al.Neurology, April 05, 2019 -
Editorial
The American Academy of Neurology's quality improvement effortsA fine work in progressGary M. Franklin, Gary S. Gronseth et al.Neurology, April 05, 2019 -
Eye on Practice
Quality improvement and practice-based research in neurology using the electronic medical recordDemetrius M. Maraganore, Roberta Frigerio, Nazia Kazmi et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, September 24, 2015 -
Commentary
Using EHRs to advance epilepsy careJuma S. Mbwana, Zachary M. Grinspan, Russell Bailey et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, December 20, 2018