Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To validate quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI thresholds that correlate with poor outcome in comatose cardiac arrest survivors, we conducted a clinician-blinded study and prospectively obtained MRIs from comatose patients after cardiac arrest.
Methods Consecutive comatose post-cardiac arrest adult patients were prospectively enrolled. MRIs obtained within 7 days after arrest were evaluated. The clinical team was blinded to the DWI MRI results and followed a prescribed prognostication algorithm. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and thresholds differentiating good and poor outcome were analyzed. Poor outcome was defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of ≤2 at 6 months after arrest.
Results Ninety-seven patients were included, and 75 patients (77%) had MRIs. In 51 patients with MRI completed by postarrest day 7, the prespecified threshold of >10% of brain tissue with an ADC <650 ×10−6 mm2/s was highly predictive for poor outcome with a sensitivity of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.80), a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.77–0.998), and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.94 (95% CI 0.71–0.997). The mean whole-brain ADC was higher among patients with good outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that ADC <650 ×10−6 mm2/s had an area under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65–0.93, p < 0.001). Quantitative DWI MRI data improved prognostication of both good and poor outcomes.
Conclusions This prospective, clinician-blinded study validates previous research showing that an ADC <650 ×10−6 mm2/s in >10% of brain tissue in an MRI obtained by postarrest day 7 is highly specific for poor outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest.
Glossary
- ADC=
- apparent diffusion coefficient;
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- DWI=
- diffusion-weighted imaging;
- GOS=
- Glasgow Outcome Scale;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- NPV=
- negative predictive value;
- PPV=
- positive predictive value;
- ROC=
- receiver operating characteristic curve;
- SSEP=
- somatosensory evoked potentia
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Podcast: NPub.org/yh8fgr
- Received June 28, 2019.
- Accepted in final form November 1, 2019.
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Ann Yeh and Dr. Daniela Castillo Villagrán
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Brief Communications
Marchiafava–Bignami disease: Diffusion-weighted MRI in corpus callosum and cortical lesionsP. Méneégon, I. Sibon, C. Pachai et al.Neurology, August 08, 2005 -
Articles
Diffusion-perfusion MR evaluation of perihematomal injury in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhageC. S. Kidwell, J. L. Saver, J. Mattiello et al.Neurology, November 13, 2001 -
Articles
Multislice diffusion mapping for 3-D evolution of cerebral ischemia in a rat stroke modelW. Reith, Y. Hasegawa, L. L. Latour et al.Neurology, January 01, 1995 -
Article
Clinical and radiologic features of encephalopathy during 2011 E coli O111 outbreak in JapanJun-ichi Takanashi, Hiromichi Taneichi, Takako Misaki et al.Neurology, January 17, 2014