This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
I read with interest the study by Kalilani et al.1 that identified the treatment gap in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy in the United States and the excellent accompanying editorial by Drs. Berg and Feyissa.2 Hindsight is said to be 20/20 and, as a physician, one is able to evaluate past choices and decisions more clearly than at the time when the choice first presented. Epilepsy is no different; at the time of pathologic onset or clinical presentation, it is difficult to evaluate the course the disease will take in an individual patient. Epilepsy is also unique in that it requires long-term, at times lifelong, treatment with an anticonvulsant drug (many with potentially serious side effects). That, in my view, is a common reason why physicians may choose not to treat epilepsy at the time of clinical presentation in favor of a watchful waiting approach.
Footnotes
Author disclosures are available upon request (journal{at}neurology.org).
- © 2020 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
