Harnessing real-world data to inform treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Consensus is lacking regarding the initiation and sequencing of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for management of multiple sclerosis (MS), resulting in variable use in clinical practice. As novel DMTs with different efficacy and safety profiles emerge based on clinical trials, it is increasingly important to compare the effectiveness and safety of DMTs in clinical practice. Comparing individual therapies in a pairwise fashion in a robust randomized clinical trial (RCT) is costly, rarely occurs, and may not generalize well to the clinical setting, given that clinical trial populations often exclude individuals with comorbidities and of extreme ages.1
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
See page 290
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Research
Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centersBrandi Vollmer, Daniel Ontaneda, Anasua Bandyopadhyay et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, July 11, 2018 -
Research
Effect of switching from natalizumab to moderate- vs high-efficacy DMT in clinical practiceCarrie M. Hersh, Haleigh Harris, Devon Conway et al.Neurology: Clinical Practice, February 12, 2020 -
Article
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosisDavid-Axel Laplaud, Romain Casey, Laetitia Barbin et al.Neurology, July 12, 2019 -
Article
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarateA nationwide cohort studyMathias Due Buron, Thor Ameri Chalmer, Finn Sellebjerg et al.Neurology, March 15, 2019