Prevalence of highly effective contraception use by women with epilepsy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To determine (1) the proportion of women with epilepsy (WWE) at risk of unintended pregnancy who use highly effective contraception, (2) demographic predictors, and (3) folic acid (FA) use.
Methods These cross-sectional data come from 311 US WWE, 18–47 years, who participated in the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) web-based survey in 2017. They provided demographic, epilepsy, antiepileptic drug (AED), contraceptive, and FA data. We report frequencies of highly effective contraception use and use logistic regression to determine demographic predictors. We report the proportion who take FA.
Results A total of 186 (59.8%) of the 311 WWE were at risk of unintended pregnancy. A total of 131 (70.4%) used a highly effective contraceptive category; 55 (29.6%) did not. An additional 13 (7.0%) used a combination of generally effective hormonal contraception with an enzyme-inducing AED, which poses increased risk of unintended pregnancy. Overall, 68 (36.6%) of the 186 WWE at risk did not use highly effective contraception. Increasing income (p = 0.004) and having insurance (p = 0.048) were predictors of highly effective contraception. A total of 50.0% took FA supplement. There was no significant difference in relation to the use or lack of use of highly effective contraception.
Conclusion A total of 36.6% of WWE in the EBCR did not use highly effective contraception and 50.0% did not take FA in 2017 despite the important negative consequences of unintended pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes. There is a need for more readily available information and counseling on safe and effective contraception and FA use for this community.
Glossary
- ACOG=
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;
- AED=
- antiepileptic drug;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- EBCR=
- Epilepsy Birth Control Registry;
- EIAED=
- enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug;
- FA=
- folic acid;
- InhAED=
- enzyme-inhibiting antiepileptic drug;
- IUD=
- intrauterine device;
- NEIAED=
- non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug;
- RR=
- relative risk;
- WWE=
- women with epilepsy
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received September 17, 2018.
- Accepted in final form February 8, 2019.
- © 2019 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Babak Hooshmand and Dr. David Smith
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Predictors of unintended pregnancy in women with epilepsyAndrew G. Herzog, Hannah B. Mandle, Kaitlyn E. Cahill et al.Neurology, January 25, 2017 -
Article
Unintended pregnancy, prenatal care, newborn outcomes, and breastfeeding in women with epilepsyEmily L. Johnson, Anne E. Burke, Anqi Wang et al.Neurology, August 10, 2018 -
Articles
Importance of monotherapy in women across the reproductive cycleGeorgia Montouris et al.Neurology, December 10, 2007 -
Views & Reviews
Management issues for women with epilepsyA review of the literatureC. A. Zahn, M. J. Morrell, S. D. Collins et al.Neurology, October 01, 1998