Hemodynamic assessments of venous pulsatile tinnitus using 4D-flow MRI
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To use 4D-flow MRI to characterize hemodynamics of transverse and sigmoid sinus in venous pulsatile tinnitus (PT) patients and to investigate their differences vs healthy controls.
Methods A total of 21 patients with venous PT and 11 healthy controls were included in the retrospective study. All participants underwent 4D-flow and magnetic resonance venography scan in a 3.0T magnetic resonance scanner. All visualization, quantification, and analysis of 4D-flow data were performed using dedicated software. Two independent reviewers evaluated the existence of vortex or turbulence. Covariance analysis adjusted for age was used to compare average through-plane velocity (Vtp_avg), maximum through-plane velocity (Vtp_max), average velocity (Vavg), maximum velocity (Vmax), average blood flow (Flowavg), and pulsatility index (PI) between PT and control group.
Results There were hemodynamic differences between PT patients and healthy controls. Compared with the control group, the PT group showed significantly higher Vtp_avg, Vtp_max, Vavg, Vmax, and Flowavg, and slightly higher PI. For the assessment of flow pattern, inter-reader reproducibility was excellent (κ = 1.00). Vortex or turbulence was observed in PT patients with good sensitivity (86.4%) and specificity (90.9%). Drainage dominance was more frequently observed in patients (15/21, 71.4%) than healthy controls (4/11, 36.4%).
Conclusions Significant hemodynamic differences were found between venous PT patients and healthy controls with 4D-flow MRI. Hemodynamic conditions could serve as noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment evaluation of venous PT.
Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that 4D-flow MRI accurately identifies patients with venous PT.
Glossary
- MR=
- magnetic resonance;
- MRV=
- magnetic resonance venography;
- PI=
- pulsatility index;
- PPU=
- peripheral pulse unit;
- PT=
- pulsatile tinnitus;
- SSDD=
- sigmoid sinus diverticulum or dehiscence
Footnotes
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received December 5, 2017.
- Accepted in final form April 28, 2018.
- © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Ann Yeh and Dr. Daniela Castillo Villagrán
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Resident & Fellow Section
Child Neurology: Mimics of cerebral sinovenous thrombosisA pediatric case seriesElizabeth Kouzmitcheva, Pradeep Krishnan, Nomazulu Dlamini et al.Neurology, October 15, 2018 -
ARTICLES
Cerebral venography and manometry in idiopathic intracranial hypertensionJ.O. King, P.J. Mitchell, K.R. Thomson et al.Neurology, December 01, 1995 -
Articles
Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertensionClinical and radiologic outcome of 10 consecutive patientsA. Donnet, P. Metellus, O. Levrier et al.Neurology, February 19, 2008 -
Article
Clinical course of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with transverse sinus stenosisBryan D. Riggeal, Beau B. Bruce, Amit M. Saindane et al.Neurology, December 26, 2012