Outcomes after ischemic stroke caused by intracranial atherosclerosis vs dissection
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective To compare the outcomes between patients with nontraumatic intracranial arterial dissection (ICAD) and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) using high-resolution MRI (HR-MRI).
Methods We conducted a prospective study using HR-MRI in patients with acute symptomatic cerebrovascular disease due to intracranial occlusive disease and no dissection on luminal images. Patients were followed-up for 27.9 ± 19.3 months. We compared the functional outcome, recurrence, and changes in vascular status between patients with ICAD (dissection and no plaque on HR-MRI) and ICAS (atherosclerosis plaque on HR-MRI).
Results We included 312 patients (mean age, 59.0 ± 14.2 years; men, 58.3%), of whom 113 had ICAD and 199 had ICAS. The functional outcome (as measured by modified Rankin Scale score) on the 90th day after symptom onset was not different between the groups, after adjusted for other factors (p = 0.095). However, recurrent ischemic cerebrovascular disease on the relevant vascular territory was lower in the ICAD group (7 patients, 6.2%) than in the ICAS group (37 patients, 18.6%). ICAD was a significant independent determinant of disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.98). Improvement in vascular stenosis on follow-up vascular studies was more frequently observed in ICAD (50.7%) than in ICAS (11.6%). ICAD was an independent determinant of vascular improvement (odds ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 3.32–19.01).
Conclusion Considering the high prevalence of ICAD in the patients with presumed ICAS and the differential outcomes between ICAD and ICAS, HR-MRI may be a useful diagnostic tool in this population.
Glossary
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- FOV=
- field of view;
- HR-MRI=
- high-resolution MRI;
- ICAD=
- intracranial arterial dissection;
- ICAS=
- intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis;
- LICVD=
- large intracranial vessel disease;
- MACE=
- major adverse cardiovascular event;
- MMD=
- moyamoya disease;
- MRA=
- magnetic resonance angiography;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- RCVS=
- reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome;
- SENSE=
- sensitivity encoding;
- TE=
- echo time;
- TOF=
- time-of-flight;
- TR=
- repetition time;
- VISTA=
- volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received January 11, 2018.
- Accepted in final form July 28, 2018.
- © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial unruptured vertebrobasilar artery dissectionB.M. Kim, S.H. Kim, D.I. Kim et al.Neurology, May 16, 2011 -
Articles
Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-tesla contrast-enhanced MRIR. H. Swartz, S. S. Bhuta, R. I. Farb et al.Neurology, February 16, 2009 -
Article
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and cervical artery dissection in 20 patientsJérôme Mawet, Monique Boukobza, Julie Franc et al.Neurology, July 24, 2013 -
Resident & Fellow section
Clinical Reasoning: A 36-Year-Old Woman Presenting With Headache PostpartumAhmad Nehme, Laurent Létourneau-Guillon, Céline Odier et al.Neurology, December 04, 2020