Statistical SPECT processing in MRI-negative epilepsy surgery
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the benefit of statistical SPECT processing over traditional subtraction methods, we compared ictal–interictal SPECT analyzed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (ISAS), statistical ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (STATISCOM), and subtraction ictal–interictal SPECT coregistered with MRI (SISCOM) in patients with MRI-negative focal temporal lobe epilepsy (nTLE) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (nETLE).
Methods: We retrospectively identified 49 consecutive cases of drug-resistant focal epilepsy that had a negative preoperative MRI and underwent interictal and ictal SPECT prior to resective epilepsy surgery. Interictal and ictal SPECT scans were analyzed using SISCOM, ISAS, and STATISCOM to create hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion maps for each patient. Reviewers blinded to clinical data and the SPECT analysis method marked the site of probable seizure origin and indicated their confidence in the localization.
Results: In nTLE and nETLE, the hyperperfusions detected by STATISCOM (71% nTLE, 57% nETLE) and ISAS (67% nTLE, 53% nETLE) were more often colocalized with surgery resection site compared to SISCOM (38% nTLE, 36% nETLE). In nTLE, localization of the hyperperfusion to the region of surgery was associated with an excellent outcome for STATISCOM (p = 0.005) and ISAS (p = 0.027), but not in SISCOM (p = 0.071). This association was not present in nETLE for any method.
Conclusion: In an unselected group of patients with normal MRI and focal epilepsy, SPM-based methods of SPECT processing showed better localization of SPECT hyperperfusion to surgical resection site and higher interobserver agreement compared to SISCOM. These results show the benefit of statistical SPECT processing methods and further highlight the challenge of nETLE.
GLOSSARY
- ETLE=
- extratemporal lobe epilepsy;
- FWHM=
- full-width at half-maximum;
- iEEG=
- intracranial EEG;
- IRB=
- institutional review board;
- ISAS=
- ictal–interictal SPECT analyzed by statistical parametric mapping;
- MEG=
- magnetoencephalography;
- nETLE=
- MRI-negative extratemporal lobe epilepsy;
- nTLE=
- MRI-negative focal temporal lobe epilepsy;
- SISCOM=
- subtraction ictal–interictal SPECT coregistered with MRI;
- SPM=
- statistical parametric mapping;
- STATISCOM=
- statistical ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI analysis;
- TLE=
- temporal lobe epilepsy
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 910
- Received July 2, 2013.
- Accepted in final form October 23, 2013.
- © 2014 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Anti-Hu Antibodies in Patients With Neurologic Side Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Dr. Josep Dalmau and Dr. Mar Guasp
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Ictal SPECT statistical parametric mapping in temporal lobe epilepsy surgeryN. J. Kazemi, G. A. Worrell, S. M. Stead et al.Neurology, December 28, 2009 -
Articles
Subtraction SPECT co-registered to MRI improves postictal SPECT localization of seizure fociT.J. O’Brien, E.L. So, B.P. Mullan et al.Neurology, January 01, 1999 -
Articles
Intracranial ictal onset zone in nonlesional lateral temporal lobe epilepsy on scalp ictal EEGS. K. Lee, C. H. Yun, J. B. Oh et al.Neurology, September 22, 2003 -
Editorial
Resecting without detecting the lesion in extratemporal lobe epilepsy?Thomas R. Henry et al.Neurology, February 14, 2014