A cluster-randomized trial to improve stroke care in hospitals
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the effect of performance feedback on acute ischemic stroke care quality in Minnesota hospitals.
Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial design with hospital as the unit of randomization was used. Care quality was defined as adherence to 10 performance measures grouped into acute, in-hospital, and discharge care. Following preintervention data collection, all hospitals received a report on baseline care quality. Additionally, in experimental hospitals, clinical opinion leaders delivered customized feedback to care providers and study personnel worked with hospital administrators to implement changes targeting identified barriers to stroke care. Multilevel models examined experimental vs control, preintervention and postintervention performance changes and secular trends in performance.
Results: Nineteen hospitals were randomized with a total of 1,211 acute ischemic stroke cases preintervention and 1,094 cases postintervention. Secular trends were significant with improvement in both experimental and control hospitals for acute (odds ratio = 2.7, p = 0.007) and in-hospital (odds ratio = 1.5, p < 0.0001) care but not discharge care. There was no significant intervention effect for acute, in-hospital, or discharge care.
Conclusion: There was no definite intervention effect: both experimental and control hospitals showed significant secular trends with performance improvement. Our results illustrate the potential fallacy of using historical controls for evaluating quality improvement interventions.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that informing hospital leaders of compliance with ischemic stroke quality indicators followed by a structured quality improvement intervention did not significantly improve compliance more than informing hospital leaders of compliance with stroke quality indicators without a quality improvement intervention.
Glossary
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- HERF=
- Healthcare Evaluation and Research Foundation;
- ICC=
- intracluster correlation coefficient;
- ITT=
- intent-to-treat;
- MCCAP=
- Minnesota Clinical Comparison and Assessment Program;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- PRISMM=
- Project for the Improvement of Stroke Care Management in Minnesota;
- PSC=
- Primary Stroke Center Certification;
- QI=
- quality improvement;
- RCT=
- randomized controlled trial;
- tPA=
- tissue plasminogen activator.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Ann Yeh and Dr. Daniela Castillo Villagrán
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Quality of hospital care in African American and white patients with ischemic stroke and TIAB. S. Jacobs, G. Birbeck, A. J. Mullard et al.Neurology, March 27, 2006 -
Articles
Do-not-resuscitate orders, quality of care, and outcomes in veterans with acute ischemic strokeMathew J. Reeves, Laura J. Myers, Linda S. Williams et al.Neurology, October 24, 2012 -
Article
Effects of centralizing acute stroke servicesA prospective cohort studySidsel Hastrup, Soren P. Johnsen, Thorkild Terkelsen et al.Neurology, June 15, 2018 -
Articles
Influence of stroke subtype on quality of care in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke ProgramE. E. Smith, L. Liang, A. Hernandez et al.Neurology, August 31, 2009