This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Patients with a newly detected brain mass and no history of cancer often undergo extensive diagnostic testing in search of a systemic primary neoplasm prior to selection of a biopsy site, potentially leading to unnecessary expense and delay. We sought patterns in the evaluation of these patients to allow rapid selection of a biopsy site.
Methods: We compared the diagnostic evaluation of 176 patients with newly detected brain masses who were ultimately determined to have a metastatic or primary lesion.
Results: In 88 patients presenting with brain metastasis, lung cancer was markedly overrepresented as a primary tumor, occurring in 82% of patients. Brain MRI and chest CT together identified the site for diagnostic biopsy in all except for two of the 176 patients. One-half of the patients with metastasis had brain biopsy as the primary diagnostic procedure, with 80% undergoing a craniotomy rather than needle biopsy. The initial management decision in the majority of metastasis patients was whether to perform a craniotomy for resection of tumor. Whereas patients with single and cerebellar lesions were most likely to undergo craniotomy, the extent of systemic disease did not affect the decision to recommend a neurosurgical procedure. The average time to biopsy for patients with metastatic and primary tumors was 4.7 days and 6.0 days. In this retrospective population, we estimated that evaluation with brain MRI and chest CT, followed by an early neurosurgical decision, could reduce the time to diagnosis by at least 10%.
Conclusions: Chest CT and brain MRI, if used together as initial diagnostic studies, would have identified a biopsy site in 97% of patients with a newly detected brain mass.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
