This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether apraxic patients’ better performance with real tools compared to miming is due to the tactile feedback provided by holding the tool.
Methods: Ten patients with aphasia and apraxia from left hemisphere damage were asked to demonstrate the use of 12 tools and objects under three conditions: miming with empty hands, miming with an implement shaped like the handle of the tool, and using the real tool with its corresponding object.
Results: Whereas real tool use was much better than pantomime in all patients, tactile feedback from the isolated handle facilitated miming only in some and deteriorated it in others so that across the group there was no significant improvement.
Conclusions: The better performance of real than of pretended tool use does not depend on tactile feedback per se, but on the mechanical affordances and constraints of tools and objects transmitted by this feedback in real use. Tactile feedback deprived of these contents and restricted to the shape of the handle does not substantially help produce the appropriate action.
- Received March 29, 2004.
- Accepted July 12, 2004.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
