Yield of screening for new aneurysms after treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: Patients who have been successfully treated for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are at risk for new episodes. The authors studied the effect of screening with CT angiography (CTA) for new aneurysms.
Methods: In a decision model, the authors compared the strategies “screening” and “no screening” after SAH. A literature review yielded the risks of aneurysm recurrence, complications of CTA, and re-treatment. The authors estimated the expected number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), the number of SAH, and the mortality and disability rates for both strategies. They evaluated screening at intervals of 2, 5, and 10 years after SAH, using 10 years and remaining life expectancy as time horizon.
Results: The expected number of QALYs 10 years after clipping was virtually the same for no screening (8.33), screening once after 5 years (8.28), and screening every 2 years (8.27). With screening every 2 years, the expected rate of new SAH decreased from 1.9 to 0.5%, and mortality decreased from 0.9 to 0.6%; however, the disability rate increased from 0.5 to 1.9%. Results were comparable with remaining life expectancy as time horizon and for screening after initial treatment with coils. The key estimates of the analyses were the incidence and rupture rate of new aneurysms, the risk of dying from recurrent SAH, the utility of disability, and the risk of complications from DSA and re-treatment.
Conclusions: Presently, screening for new aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage cannot be recommended. Screening may prevent new episodes of subarachnoid hemorrhage but with too high a cost in terms of complications from preventive treatment.
- Received April 23, 2003.
- Accepted November 3, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Effectiveness and costs of screening for aneurysms every 5 years after subarachnoid hemorrhageMarieke J.H. Wermer, Hendrik Koffijberg, Irene C. van der Schaaf et al.Neurology, April 16, 2008 -
Articles
Optimal screening strategy for familial intracranial aneurysmsA cost-effectiveness analysisA. Stijntje E. Bor, Hendrik Koffijberg, Marieke J.H. Wermer et al.Neurology, May 24, 2010 -
Articles
Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment of intracranial aneurysmsNew data and uncertaintiesJacoba P. Greving, Gabriël J.E. Rinkel, Erik Buskens et al.Neurology, March 18, 2009 -
Articles
Which unruptured cerebral aneurysms should be treated?A cost–utility analysisS. Claiborne Johnston, Daryl R. Gress, James G. Kahn et al.Neurology, June 01, 1999