This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between the event-related cerebral potential (ERP) and perceptual awareness by the subject is poorly understood. The authors manipulated the process of stimulus recognition to examine the effect of changes in a subject’s awareness on different components of the ERP and on behavioral (motor) responses.
Methods: Ten subjects listened to a series of 400 tone pips, one of which (frequent tone) was slightly louder than the other (rare tone; 14% of trials). Stimuli were presented in blocks of 10 tones and, following each block, subjects were asked how many rare tones they had detected and if they were aware of any errors that they had made during that block. Cerebral and motor responses were recorded by surface electrodes.
Results: When subjects were aware of having responded erroneously to either the rare or frequent tone, their response times were shorter than for correct responses to that tone. When subjects were unaware of such errors, however, the response times were delayed compared to correct responses and to error responses of which the subject was aware. When the subject made an error by responding to the rare tone as if it were frequent and was aware of the error, the N2 and P3 latencies were delayed. By contrast, when subjects were unaware of such errors, no N2 or P3 components were present. Similar findings were noted when subjects responded to a frequent tone as if it were rare.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the N2 and P3 components of the ERP reflect the awareness of the subject that an unexpected event has occurred, regardless of whether it is an unexpected stimulus or an unexpectedly erroneous response to that stimulus. The recording of ERP may provide a means of measuring perceptual awareness in other contexts.
- Received June 11, 2003.
- Accepted July 29, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
