This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Although metrics derived from conventional MRI (cMRI) are widely used as outcome measures in clinical trials of MS, no formal study has been performed to validate cMRI metrics as surrogate endpoints for disability progression in MS.
Methods: A validation procedure was applied to the clinical and MRI data collected in the context of the European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon β-1b (IFNβ-1b) in patients with secondary progressive MS. The Prentice operational criteria were used to assess surrogacy for the number of active lesions seen on the first year T2-weighted MRI scans and the percentage T2 lesion volume change between the baseline and the first year MRI scans. The primary clinical outcome was disability at study exit (3 years), adjusted for the baseline disability.
Results: The number of active T2 lesions and the T2 lesion volume percentage change over the first year of the study accounted for 57% of the treatment effect on disability progression over the entire study duration. On the contrary, the same cMRI metrics accounted for 79% of the treatment effect on the relapse rate.
Conclusions: This study shows that the beneficial effect of IFNβ-1b on disability accumulation in patients with secondary progressive MS is, to a large extent, independent of the changes detected using cMRI. As a consequence, cMRI metrics should not be used as a stand-alone measure of outcome in phase III trials of IFNβ in secondary progressive MS.
- Received September 6, 2002.
- Accepted January 30, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg