The humoral response in the pathogenesis of gluten ataxia
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
To the Editor:
Patients with sporadic ataxia (about 10%) have evidence of gluten sensitivity, a syndrome that is contingent on intolerance to dietary gluten.1 Intestinal manifestations result from an immunologically mediated process, while the pathogenesis of neurologic symptoms is not yet understood. As in celiac disease, the HLA DQB1*0201 haplotype is found in 70% of patients with gluten ataxia, suggesting that neurologic symptoms are likely to refer to similar pathomechanisms.
In their recent article Hadjivassiliou et al.2 report the critical role of circulating antibodies against Purkinje cells in gluten ataxia.2 However, pathologic studies have pointed to a cell-mediated immune response with loss of Purkinje cells and lymphocytic infiltration.3 The question to address is whether circulating antibodies account for cerebellar symptoms in gluten ataxia by testing patients’ sera for crossreactivity with CNS tissue. Cerebellar slices of Callithrix jacchus were stained with sera of 10 patients with gluten ataxia (mean age 53.4 ± 19.7), 6 patients with hereditary cerebellar ataxia, and 9 healthy controls. Patients were not under a gluten-free diet nor did they receive any immune-modulating therapy. Sera of patients with anti-Yo syndrome and anti-Hu syndrome served as positive controls for antineuronal reactivities.
All sera were tested at different dilutions with a BIOCHIP-mosaic containing primate cerebellum and liver as control tissue (Euroimmum, Germany). Fluorescently labeled anti-IgG or anti-IgA secondary antibodies were used as conjugates. This technique is characterized by staining specifications under controlled conditions with sensitivities comparable to immunocytochemical detection methods. Results were compared to staining sensitivities of positive controls on rat cerebellar slices using immunocytochemistry (peroxidase detection) applying the BIOCHIP immunofluorescence technique. Both techniques yielded comparable detection thresholds in anti-Hu and anti-Yo syndrome even at high dilutions, and the immunofluorescence technique provided higher specificity with more defined cellular and subcellular distribution of staining.
Whereas anti-IgG in …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. David Beversdorf and Dr. Ryan Townley
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Editorials
Neurologic manifestations of celiac diseaseProven, or just a gut feeling?Anne H. Cross, Paul T. Golumbek et al.Neurology, May 27, 2003 -
Articles
Autoantibody targeting of brain and intestinal transglutaminase in gluten ataxiaM. Hadjivassiliou, M. Mäki, D. S. Sanders et al.Neurology, February 13, 2006 -
Article
Effect of gluten-free diet on cerebellar MR spectroscopy in gluten ataxiaMarios Hadjivassiliou, Richard A. Grünewald, David S. Sanders et al.Neurology, July 19, 2017 -
Article
Transglutaminase 6 antibodies in the diagnosis of gluten ataxiaMarios Hadjivassiliou, Pascale Aeschlimann, David S. Sanders et al.Neurology, April 10, 2013