This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: Examining the unresolved relationship between the lower motor neuron disorder progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) and ALS is important in clinical practice because of emerging therapies.
Methods: Spinal and brainstem tissues donated from patients with ALS/motor neuron disorder (n = 81) were examined. Using retrospective case note review, the authors assigned patients into three categories: PMA (12), PMA progressing to ALS (6), and ALS ab initio (63). Conventional stains for long tract degeneration and immunocytochemistry for ubiquitin and the macrophage marker CD68 were examined.
Results: Rapid progression and typical ubiquitinated inclusions in lower motor neurons were present in 77 (95%) of the cases. Immunocytochemistry for CD68 was a more sensitive marker of long tract pathology in comparison with conventional stains. Half of the cases with PMA showed corticospinal tract degeneration by CD68.
Conclusion: Patients with PMA frequently have undetected long tract pathology and most have ubiquitinated inclusions typical of ALS. A patient presenting with PMA with rapid clinical evolution likely has the pathology and pathophysiology of ALS whether or not upper motor neuron signs evolve.
- Received September 9, 2002.
- Accepted January 17, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
