This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive dysfunction is the most common form of neurologic impairment after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
Objective: To evaluate the impact of global and domain-specific cognitive impairment on functional recovery and quality of life (QOL) after SAH.
Methods: One hundred thirteen patients (mean age 49 years; 68% women) were evaluated 3 months after SAH. Three simple tests of global mental status and neuropsychological tests to assess seven specific cognitive domains were administered. Four aspects of outcome (global handicap, disability, emotional status, and QOL) were compared between cognitively impaired and unimpaired patients with analysis-of-covariance models controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and education. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the relative contribution of global and domain-specific cognitive status for predicting concurrent modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) scores.
Results: Impairment of global mental status on the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) was associated with poor performance in all seven cognitive domains (all p < 0.0005) and was the only cognitive measure associated with poor recovery in all four aspects of outcome (all p ≤ 0.005). Cognitive impairment in four specific domains was also associated with functional disability or reduced QOL. After accounting for global cognitive impairment with the TICS, however, neuropsychological testing did not contribute additional predictive value for concurrent mRS or SIP total scores.
Conclusions: Cognitive impairment impacts broadly on functional status, emotional health, and QOL after SAH. The TICS may be a useful alternative to more detailed neuropsychological testing for detecting clinically relevant global cognitive impairment after SAH.
- Received April 1, 2002.
- Accepted August 9, 2002.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
