This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and compare it to the Quinn and Consensus criteria for MSA using neuropathologically examined cases from the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders.
Methods: Fifty-nine cases with a neurologic diagnosis of MSA when last assessed prior to death were studied.
Results: In 51 (86%) of these cases, the diagnosis of MSA was confirmed pathologically. False positive diagnoses included PD (n = 6), progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 1), and cerebrovascular disease (n = 1). When applying either set of diagnostic criteria, a diagnosis of probable MSA gave lower sensitivity but higher positive predictive value than one of possible MSA. Application of either set of diagnostic criteria was superior to actual clinical diagnosis made early in the disease, but there was little difference by the last clinic visit.
Conclusions: This study shows a high diagnostic accuracy for the clinical diagnosis of MSA by neurologists, with PD accounting for most of the false positive diagnoses. Application of either Quinn or Consensus criteria was superior to actual clinical diagnosis made early in the disease, but there was little difference by last clinic visit.
- Received March 6, 2002.
- Accepted June 20, 2002.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Involvement of vagal autonomic nuclei in multiple system atrophy and Lewy body disease
When DLB, PD, and PSP masquerade as MSA
Accuracy of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome)
Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy