This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the clinical, CSF, and radiologic findings and long-term follow-up in a cohort of patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and to determine possible prognostic factors for progression to MS.
Methods: Forty adults (28 women, mean age 33.5 years) diagnosed with ADEM were analyzed. Clinical symptoms, cranial MRI and CSF findings, and the response to a standardized treatment during the acute phase of the disease were analyzed by chart review. The final diagnosis of ADEM or clinically definite MS was established upon follow-up examination after 8 to 137 months. The patients with ADEM and MS were compared to detect differences between the two groups.
Results: Fifteen patients had a preceding infection (n = 14) or immunization (n = 1). The most frequent clinical signs were motor deficit (80%), followed by sensory deficits, brainstem signs, and ataxia. CSF findings were highly variable; normal results were present in 20% of patients. Oligoclonal bands were positive in 65% of patients. Ninety-five percent of all patients improved during the acute phase of the disease. Upon follow-up, 14 patients had developed clinically definite MS. Of the 26 patients with the final diagnosis of ADEM, two patients had died, nine had minor deficits, three had moderate deficits, and 12 patients had no remaining symptoms. Patients with the final diagnosis of ADEM were older, and more often had a preceding infection, clinical signs of brainstem involvement, a higher CSF albumin fraction, and infratentorial lesions.
Conclusions: Many patients initially diagnosed with ADEM develop clinically definite MS upon long-term follow-up. The authors found no useful diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of a first episode of MS from monophasic ADEM. The term ADEM may still be employed as a description of a clinical syndrome, but should not be used as a distinct entity until reliable diagnostic criteria have been developed.
- Received August 10, 2000.
- Accepted December 2, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
