This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the predictors of outcome of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) surgery in a population-based cohort of injured workers.
Methods: All injured workers in the Washington State Workers’ Compensation system who received TOS surgery during 1986 to 1991 were identified by computerized bill payment records and validated by medical record review (n = 158). The main outcome measure was work disability status 1 year after surgery. Additional functional status and quality of life outcomes were determined by telephone survey an average of 4.8 years after operation. A sample of workers with a TOS diagnosis who did not receive surgery during 1987 to 1989 were identified as a comparison group (n = 95).
Results: Sixty percent of workers were still work disabled 1 year after surgery. The strongest predictors of remaining disabled were the amount of work disability before surgery (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.28), longer time between injury and TOS diagnosis (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.64), and older age at injury (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13). There was no relationship between type of surgery, presence of any provocative tests, or experience of surgeon and work disability outcome. In follow-up surveys an average of 4.8 years after surgery, 72.5% of workers still reported they were “limited a lot” in vigorous activities. Compared with a nonsurgical sample of TOS patients, those receiving surgery had 50% greater medical costs and were three to four times more likely to be work disabled.
Conclusions: The outcome of TOS surgery among injured workers is worse than has generally been reported. The nonspecific neurogenic TOS diagnosis, the complexity of workers’ compensation cases, and the adverse event profile are likely substantial contributors to the worse outcomes reported here. Well-designed prospective studies and randomized trials are required to elucidate any role of TOS surgery in nonspecific TOS.
- Received July 15, 1999.
- Accepted December 14, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg