This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the correlation between pre- and perioperative variables on the outcome of children undergoing focal resections for medically intractable partial epilepsy.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of pre- and perioperative variables in a cohort of 75 patients younger than 12 years of age who underwent excisional surgery and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Outcome, measured by postoperative seizure frequency, was analyzed as a function of age at seizure onset, duration of epilepsy, presence of cognitive impairment, lobe of seizure origin, presence of a lesion, histopathology, and completeness of resection. Completeness of resection was defined on the basis of excising both the entire structural lesion if present and the region revealing prominent interictal and ictal abnormalities on intracranial EEG.
Results: Seventy-seven percent of patients had good outcomes (class 1 or 2), and 59% were seizure-free. Lesional status, site of resection, and pathologic diagnoses were not significant predictors of outcome except for in multilobar resection, for which overall outcome was relatively poor (44% class 3 or 4; 22% seizure-free). Completeness of resection was the only significant predictor of good outcome (p < 0.001), with 92% of patients who underwent complete resection of the epileptogenic zone achieving good outcome compared with 50% of patients who had incomplete resections.
Conclusion: In this series of pediatric patients, complete resection of the lesion and the electrographically abnormal region was the main determinant of outcome after focal resections. Except for multilobar resections, other factors examined in this study did not significantly influence postoperative seizure prognosis and should not influence candidate selection for the surgical process.
- Received December 4, 1998.
- Accepted September 11, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
