A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the contribution made by cervical cord damage, assessed using a fast short-tau inversion recovery (fast-STIR) sequence and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) histogram analysis to the clinical manifestations of MS.
Background: Previous studies have failed to show significant correlations between the number and extent of T2 spinal cord lesions and the clinical status of patients with MS. Fast-STIR is more sensitive than T2-weighted imaging for detecting cervical cord MS lesions. MTR histogram analysis provides estimates of the overall disease burden in the cervical cord with higher pathologic specificity to the more destructive aspects of MS than T2-weighted scans.
Methods: We obtained fast-STIR and magnetization transfer (MT) scans from 96 patients with MS (52 with relapsing-remitting [RRMS], 33 with secondary progressive [SPMS], and 11 with primary progressive [PPMS] MS) and 21 control subjects. Dual-echo scans of the brain were also obtained and lesion load measured.
Results: Eighty-one of the patients with MS had an abnormal cervical cord scan. Patients with SPMS had more cervical cord lesions and more images with visible cervical cord damage than did patients with RRMS or PPMS (p = 0.04). The entire cohort of patients with MS had lower average MTR of the cervical cord (p = 0.006) than control subjects. Compared to control subjects, patients with RRMS had similar cervical cord MTR histogram-derived measures, whereas those with PPMS had lower average MTR (p = 0.01) and peak height (p = 0.02). Patients with SPMS had lower histogram peak height than did those with RRMS (p = 0.03). The peak position and height of the cervical cord MTR histogram were independent predictors of the probability of having locomotor disability. We found no correlation between brain T2 lesion load and any of the cervical cord MTR histogram metrics.
Conclusions: This study shows that the amount and severity of MS pathology in the cervical cord are greater in the progressive forms of the disease. An accurate assessment of cervical cord damage in MS gives information that can be used in part to explain the clinical manifestations of the disease.
- Received April 16, 1999.
- Accepted August 9, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MSC. Tortorella, B. Viti, M. Bozzali et al.Neurology, January 11, 2000 -
Articles
MRI and magnetization transfer imaging changes in the brain and cervical cord of patients with Devic’s neuromyelitis opticaM. Filippi, M.A. Rocca, L. Moiola et al.Neurology, November 01, 1999 -
Articles
Comparison of MS clinical phenotypes using conventional and magnetization transfer MRIM. Filippi, G. Iannucci, C. Tortorella et al.Neurology, February 01, 1999 -
Articles
Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRIM. Cercignani, G. Iannucci, M.A. Rocca et al.Neurology, March 14, 2000