Two patterns of clinical recovery in Guillain-Barré syndrome with IgG anti-GM1 antibody
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of anti-GM1 antibody.
Background: Whether anti-GM1 antibody is a marker of poor prognosis due to axonal degeneration in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a matter of controversy.
Methods: The clinical recovery of 41 consecutive GBS patients was analyzed.
Results: The Hughes functional grading scores were similar at the peak, and 1, 3, and 6 months after onset for the groups of patients with (n = 19) and without (n = 22) immunoglobulin (Ig) G anti-GM1 antibodies. However, the anti-GM1-positive group included significantly higher proportions of patients with poor recovery (inability to walk independently at 6 months, 5 of 19 versus 0 of 22; p = 0.01) and those with a markedly rapid recovery (improvement by two or more Hughes grades within a month, 9 of 19 versus 4 of 22; p = 0.05). The positivity of IgG anti-GM1 antibody correlated well with the electrodiagnosis of the acute motor axonal neuropathy pattern but was not always associated with poor prognosis. Anti-GM1-positive patients showed two different patterns of clinical recovery-their conditions improved slower or faster than those of the anti-GM1-negative patients, most of whom had acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
Conclusions: Anti-GM1 antibody is not always a marker of poor prognosis and, besides axonal degeneration, early reversible effects other than demyelination could be part of the pathophysiology of Guillain-Barré syndrome with IgG anti-GM1 antibody.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Sevil Yaşar and Dr. Behnam Sabayan
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Acute motor axonal neuropathy after Mycoplasma infectionEvidence of molecular mimicryK. Susuki, M. Odaka, M. Mori et al.Neurology, March 22, 2004 -
Articles
Campylobacter jejuni lipopolysaccharides in Guillain-Barré syndromeMolecular mimicry and host susceptibilityK. A. Sheikh, I. Nachamkin, T. W. Ho et al.Neurology, August 01, 1998 -
Article
Patterns of recovery in the Guillain-Barre syndromesT. W. Ho, C. Y. Li, D. R. Cornblath et al.Neurology, March 01, 1997 -
Article
Motor nerve terminal degeneration provides a potential mechanism for rapid recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy after campylobacter infectionT. W. Ho, S.-T. Hsieh, I. Nachamkin et al.Neurology, March 01, 1997