Double-crush syndrome: A critical analysis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
![Loading Loading](https://n.neurology.org/sites/all/modules/contrib/panels_ajax_tab/images/loading.gif)
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
In 1973, after assessing a large group of patients with cervical root lesions (CRLs) and upper extremity peripheral entrapment neuropathies-either carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UN-E), or both-Upton and McComas1 proposed that focal compression often occurs at more than one level along the course of a single nerve fiber. They proposed that under these circumstances a disturbance of axonal transport caused by compression at the proximal site (e.g., the cervical root) might impair the capacity of the nerve segment distal to it to resist further focal compressive injury. In this manner, an otherwise subclinical focal entrapment neuropathy (e.g., CTS) could be converted into a clinically evident one (figure 1). They assumed that this may occur even though the proximal lesion, while symptomatic, was not clinically severe. Thus, a cervical radiculopathy manifesting as little more than neck pain and stiffness could still precipitate a distal focal entrapment neuropathy. For this mechanism of nerve injury-serial compromise of axonal transport along the same nerve fiber, causing a subclinical lesion at the distal site to become symptomatic-they proposed the term double-crush syndrome (DCS). They acknowledged that this term was too restrictive because (1) the proximal focal disturbance could result from traction, rather than compression; (2) there could be more than two sites of injury along an axon; and (3) a generalized subclinical polyneuropathy, by reducing the amount of "trophic material manufactured by the perikaryon" in all peripheral nerve fibers, could serve as the proximal compression site.1
Figure 1. Diagram of the double-crush hypothesis of Upton and McComas. Shown is the perikaryon and axon, with the antegrade axoplasmic flow represented by an arrow (thickness of the arrow indicates amount of transported material). (A) Normal. (B) Severe distal injury causing axon death with degeneration. (C) Mild proximal compression causing only …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Dennis Bourdette and Dr. Lindsey Wooliscroft
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
Cervical radiculopathy and coexisting distal entrapment neuropathiesDouble-crush syndromes?Greg Morgan, Asa J. Wilbourn et al.Neurology, January 01, 1998 -
Articles
Spectrum of clinical and electrophysiologic features in HNPP patients with the 17p11.2 deletionP. Mouton, S. Tardieu, R. Gouider et al.Neurology, April 01, 1999 -
Articles
Cervical rib and median sternotomy-related brachial plexopathiesA reassessmentKerry H. Levin, Asa J. Wilbourn, Holly J. Maggiano et al.Neurology, May 01, 1998 -
Resident and Fellow Section
Clinical Reasoning: A 54-year-old woman with hand dysesthesiaMany dimensions to a common problemJ. Vijayan, Ng Esther S.T., A. K. Therimadasamy et al.Neurology, October 05, 2009