Long-term prognosis and the effect of carotid endarterectomy in patients with recurrent ipsilateral ischemic events
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and purpose: The present study examines how the prognosis of patients who present with an ischemic event (TIA or nondisabling stroke) referable to a 70 to 99% carotid artery stenosis is modified by the pattern of their ischemic history. We also examined the benefits of performing carotid endarterectomy on the recently symptomatic artery. Methods: A total of 608 patients was divided into two groups. The recent group (N = 444) consisted of patients who became newly symptomatic within the previous 6 months of their presenting event. Prior to this, they were asymptomatic. The recurrent group (N = 164) consisted of patients who had one or more ischemic events within the previous 6 months of their presenting event, as well as one or more within the previous 7 to 12 months. All events were ipsilateral to the presenting event. Results: Kaplan-Meier risk estimates of ipsilateral stroke at 2 years for medically treated patients were 18.6 +/- 3.3% in the recent group and 41.2 +/- 6.9% in the recurrent group (p = 0.0002, logrank test). For patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, the risks were 7.8 +/- 2.0% and 10.8 +/- 3.4% (p = 0.36, logrank test). Multivariate analyses did not identify any baseline patient characteristics as confounders nor any statistical interactions. Conclusions: There is a need for urgency in considering carotid endarterectomy for patients with 70 to 99% carotid artery stenosis who have had recurrent ipsilateral ischemic events extending back more than 6 months. These patients are at more than twice the risk of stroke as those who are newly symptomatic.
NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 1158-1162
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Ann Yeh and Dr. Daniela Castillo Villagrán
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Recurrent stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis awaiting revascularizationA pooled analysisElias Johansson, Elisa Cuadrado-Godia, Derek Hayden et al.Neurology, January 08, 2016 -
Special Article
Carotid endarterectomy—An evidence-based reviewReport of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of NeurologyS. Chaturvedi, A. Bruno, T. Feasby et al.Neurology, September 26, 2005 -
VIEWS AND REVIEWS
Do the facts and figures warrant a 10-fold increase in the performance of carotid endarterectomy on asymptomatic patients?Henry J.M. Barnett, Michael Eliasziw, Heather E. Meldrum et al.Neurology, March 01, 1996 -
Views and Reviews
Identifying vulnerable carotid plaques by noninvasive imagingR. M. Kwee, R. J. van Oostenbrugge, L. Hofstra et al.Neurology, June 09, 2008