This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
A witness is defined as one who provides "attestation of a fact or an event" whose attestation fulfills the role of "providing or serving as evidence" to that which has occurred. [1] Such attestation becomes concrete and enduring through either the witness' written record or the legal provision of testimony within a court of law.
By its nature, history is subject to interpretation by those who were not present. Sometimes, interpretation challenges the very existence of events themselves (historical revisionism). Historical research, therefore, must be founded upon the physical record of primary archival material and the testimony of witnesses to maintain its veracity. While the witness is often chosen by fate alone, in certain situations special skills may choose the witness. The observations made by such a witness coupled with astute interpretation of the reasons for the events themselves can serve as catalysts that modify subsequent human conduct.
Such a witness was neurology's own Leo Alexander. Because of his special skills in linguistics, neurobiology, and psychiatry, Alexander was chosen to prepare intelligence reports on medical practices within the Third Reich's army, its mental institutions, and its prison camps immediately after the end of World War II. In a frenzy of activity during one brief summer in 1945, and under a mandate from the Combined Intelligence Operative Sub-Committee (CIOS) of the United States VIIth Army, Alexander completed seven reports providing first-hand testimony of the perversion of medicine and medical science in the totalitarian setting of Nazi Germany. [2-8] These reports contained primary archival material, debriefings of physician-participants, and synopses of Alexander's review of captured documents. They were prepared not only to satisfy the intelligence needs of a victorious army, but also to fulfill an individual physician's need to record and comprehend for posterity that which bordered on the incomprehensible.
There can …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
