US neurologists
Attitudes on the US health care system
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Because the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) exists to represent the views and needs of neurologists, a mailed survey to a randomly selected sample of 520 US-based, board-certified or board-eligible neurologist members was conducted in early 1995 to determine their attitudes in four key changing areas of the US health care system: (1) provision of neurologic care, (2) neurology workforce, (3) academic research, industry sponsorship, and pharmaceutical issues, and (4) health care delivery systems issues. Frequency distributions of degree of agreement and disagreement with 40 statements regarding issues in these four areas were tabulated for the entire group of 430 respondents (response rate = 83%). Associations between these attitudes and six demographic and practice variables (age, gender, board certification, practice type, degree of managed care, and geographical region) were evaluated in an exploratory analysis. The high response rate to the survey and the similarity in demographic and practice characteristics of respondents to the entire US-based, board-certified or -eligible AAN membership support that the attitudes that were measured are likely to be representative of US neurologists, excluding resident trainees. The survey results show that neurologists are deeply concerned that patients with chronic neurologic disorders are not receiving all the neurologic services they need. Respondents show uncertainty about whether there is a current oversupply of neurologists but generally agree that there are too many neurology residency positions. Neurologists support industry sponsorship of academic medical center research and new drug development. With respect to many of the current mechanisms for health care cost containment, respondents indicate they have little confidence that these strategies are in the best interests of patients or physicians. The survey results confirm that there is no consensus among US neurologists on how to improve today's health care delivery system, and the results suggest that certain attitudes are related to neurologists' demographic and practice characteristics. Since today's health care market is volatile, regular assessments of neurologists' attitudes will be needed to assure that their views are understood and clearly represented by the AAN.
NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 279-287
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Jessica Ailani and Dr. Ailna Masters-Israilov
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Contemporary Issues
The Workforce Task Force ReportClinical implications for neurologyWilliam D. Freeman, Kenneth A. Vatz, Robert C. Griggs et al.Neurology, June 19, 2013 -
Issues of Neurologic Practice
Attitudes of US neurologists concerning the ethical dimensions of managed careJames L. Bernat, Steven P. Ringel, Barbara G. Vickrey et al.Neurology, July 01, 1997 -
Issues in Neurological Practice
Training the future neurology workforceS.P. Ringel, B.G. Vickrey, C.M. Keran et al.Neurology, January 25, 2000 -
Presidential Address
Practicing neurologyA delicate balanceSteven P. Ringel et al.Neurology, May 01, 1999