This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
We studied syllabic timing in patients with ataxia (10 with cerebellar atrophy, 6 with Friedreich's ataxia) under two conditions:in a ``natural'' sentence production context and in the context of a rapid syllable repetition task. The two tasks included comparable articulatory maneuvers. We measured syllable durations from the speech signal and analyzed variables describing average syllabic rate and within-trial variation of syllable durations. Among the observed measures, slowed syllable repetition was a particularly powerful predictor of the severity of dysarthric impairment. In sentence production, patients often performed at normal syllabic rates. Irregular pacing of syllable repetitions was frequent. Different patterns of between-articulator variation emerged in the two tasks. All patients except one were slower in rapid repetitive articulation than in sentence production. These data suggest that sentence production and rapid repetitive articulation are governed by basically different motor processes. The disproportionate slowing of ataxic patients in the repetitive task can be ascribed to adaptation to novel motor tasks being impaired in cerebellar disease.
NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 208-214
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Features of speech and swallowing dysfunction in pre-ataxic spinocerebellar ataxia type 2
Two different phenomena in basic motor speech performance in premanifest Huntington disease
fMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control
Motor speech signature of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia