This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Article abstract-We compared the treatment policy for patients with epilepsy in six Dutch cities, comprising 302,149 inhabitants, with the treatment policies of a secondary referral center (a university hospital) and tertiary referral centers (outpatient departments of epilepsy centers). By comparing the prevalence of individuals receiving antiepileptic drugs in the six cities with the epidemiologic data for epilepsy in Rochester, Minnesota, we concluded that prescription data offer a suitable means by which to estimate the prevalence of epilepsy in a community. To compare prescriptions in cases of polytherapy, we normalized data by using defined daily doses published by the WHO Collaborating Center for Drugs Statistics Methodology and the Nordic Council on Medicines and concluded that the defined daily doses of antiepileptic drugs should be further elaborated. There is a need to obtain complete dose-response curves of equivalent antiepileptic drugs in humans. The trend of drug use found in the six cities, the university hospital, and the epilepsy centers is, however, in accord with the expectations regarding primary, secondary, and tertiary referral centers.
NEUROLOGY 1996;46: 62-67
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa
► Watch
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Use of antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy and the risk of self-harm or suicidal behavior
Antiepileptic use for epilepsy and nonepilepsy disorders
Comorbidity of migraine in children presenting with epilepsy to a tertiary care center
Practice Parameter: The diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review)