@article {BergeronP6.071作者={大卫Bergeron和安东尼Vermette贾斯汀De La Sablonni {\ ' e}再保险和anne - marie礁和罗伯特•Laforce jr .)和R {\ ' e mi w·布沙尔}},title = {Finger-to-nose测试结果在{\ textquoteright}年代老年痴呆症(P6.071)},体积={88}={16}补充数量,elocation-id = {P6.071} ={2017},出版商= {Wolters Kluwer健康,公司代表美国神经病学学会},文摘={目的:描述Finger-to-nose在阿尔茨海默{\ textquoteright}年代测试结果和评估他们的诊断价值。首页背景:finger-to-nose例行测试是在患者的认知障碍的临床评估。虽然众所周知屏幕通过激活四肢的运动失调小脑功能障碍,我们发现这个测试也可以从认知的角度解释。我们描述两种典型迹象finger-to-nose试验观察到{\ textquoteright}年代老年痴呆症(AD)患者:{\ textquotedblleft}食指综合症{\ textquotedblright}和{\ textquotedblleft} {\ textquotedblright}远端压力信号。设计/方法:我们回顾了记录的广告(n = 365),患者血管性认知障碍(VCI;n = 40)和主观认知障碍(SCI);n = 56)在我们的记忆诊所。大约80 \ %的患者{\ textquoteright}包含评级finger-to-nose测试记录。结果:我们发现公元74 \ %的患者认知异常finger-to-nose测试显示,相比14 \ % VCI和2 \ % SCI(见下表)。相反,VCI患者有更多的小脑测距不准(10 \ %)比那些广告(\ < 1 \ %)。患者认知异常finger-to-nose测试有显著降低MMSE (20.7 {\ textpm} 5.8)比那些没有(25.3 {\ textpm} 4.2;p < 0.01)。 Nevertheless, cognitive abnormality on the finger-to-nose test remained more prevalent in AD than VCI regardless of the severity, even in the earliest stages (69\% in AD vs. 6\% in VCI in patients with MMSE \>25).Conclusions: The distal pressure and second finger signs are frequent yet unspecific findings at the finger-to-nose test in AD. Clinicoanatomical localization of these signs, and their prevalence in other neurodegenerative disorders, has to be clarified.Disclosure: Dr. Bergeron has nothing to disclose. Dr. Vermette has nothing to disclose. Dr. De La Sablonni{\`e}re has nothing to disclose. Dr. Cayer has nothing to disclose. Dr. Laforce has received personal compensation for activities with Eli Lilly Canada Inc. as a member of the scientific advisory board. Dr. Bouchard has nothing to disclose.}, issn = {0028-3878}, URL = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content/88/16_Supplement/P6.071}, eprint = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content}, journal = {Neurology} }