PT -期刊文章盟……Ringel盟——人维克瑞盟过w•b西博尔德作品:基兰AU - j·比伯盟布拉德利TI -培训未来神经病学员工援助- 10.1212 / WNL.54.2.480 DP - 2000年1月25日TA -神经病学第六PG - 480 - 4首页80 - 54 IP - 2 4099 - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/54/2/480.short 4100 - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/54/2/480.full所以Neurology2000 1月25日;54 AB -目的:解决培训要求未来的神经病学家,美国神经病学学会(长)调查了美国成员自己的观点关于培训未来的神经病学的劳动力。首页方法:调查575年寄给我们神经学家和425居民/同伴。受访者(54%)被问及他们对当前和未来的教育计划和设置需要提高实践能力;subspecialization问题;和non-neurologists提供神经护理的作用。神经学家的观点比较与神经病学的居民/同伴。首页结果:大多数受访者支持额外的培训在门诊,社区,和员工健康维护组织设置模式。绝大多数的受访者反对要求第五年的培训或年度技能考试,但神经学家有附属专业的兴趣和居民/ subspecialists同伴支持选择性认证和更高的费用。一般的神经学家反对这些观点。 Most neurologists feel that primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can manage uncomplicated neurologic problems, although residents/fellows are less willing to accept the role of nonphysician providers for neurologic services. Conclusions: Neurology educational programs should consider addressing deficiencies that today’s practitioners perceive. Increasing subspecialization, although favored by most neurologists, creates a challenge for the neurologic community as neurologists without subspecialty training see this trend as a threat to their livelihood.