作者@article {Ringel480 = {……Ringel维克里和人过w•b西博尔德作品:基兰和j·比伯布拉德利},标题={培训未来神经病学劳动力},体积={54}={2},页面= {480 - 480}= {2000},doi = {10.121首页2 / WNL.54.2.480},出版商= {Wolters Kluwer健康,公司代表美国神经病学学会},文摘={目的:解决培训要求未来的神经病学家,美国神经病学学会(长)调查其美国神经学成员自己的观点关于培训未来的劳动力。方法:调查575年寄给我们神经学家和425居民/同伴。受访者(54 \ %)被问及他们对当前和未来的教育计划和设置需要提高实践能力;subspecialization问题;和non-neurologists提供神经护理的作用。神经学家的观点比较与神经病学的居民/同伴。首页结果:大多数受访者支持额外的培训在门诊,社区,和员工健康维护组织设置模式。绝大多数的受访者反对要求第五年的培训或年度技能考试,但神经学家有附属专业的兴趣和居民/ subspecialists同伴支持选择性认证和更高的费用。一般的神经学家反对这些观点。 Most neurologists feel that primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants can manage uncomplicated neurologic problems, although residents/fellows are less willing to accept the role of nonphysician providers for neurologic services. Conclusions: Neurology educational programs should consider addressing deficiencies that today{\textquoteright}s practitioners perceive. Increasing subspecialization, although favored by most neurologists, creates a challenge for the neurologic community as neurologists without subspecialty training see this trend as a threat to their livelihood.}, issn = {0028-3878}, URL = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content/54/2/480}, eprint = {//www.ez-admanager.com/content/54/2/480.full.pdf}, journal = {Neurology} }